Test a Startup Within a Minute!


stopwatch 150x150 Test a Startup Within a Minute!Time is elastic: It seems to expand or contract according to some mysterious law that we don’t understand: At a red light, a minute takes FOREVER. (I know, I get stuck at them all the time as if a higher power is conspiring against me). But if you were starting up a company and looked to venture capitalist Rick Segal, of JLA Ventures, you’d find that a minute is probably not enough time.

In one of his blog posts, Segal describes a technique he uses to push startup founders to express themselves succinctly and competently. He calls it “The Stop Watch Test” and it works like this: Segal gets a stopwatch and then asks the founder to tell him in less than a minute what he or she does. The result is surprising: Segal reports from his unofficial “poll” that founders get it right only 35% of the time. [1]

Lesson learned for entrepreneurs? Talk fast and take out every other word.

No, of course that’s not the lesson learned! Instead, new entrepreneurs should create a well-crafted, compelling description of what they do and be able to deliver it flawlessly in less than 60 seconds. They need to cover the problem, solution, and where the money is.

And investors in early-stage businesses would do well to ask their prospective investments to perform a similar exercise: Pay attention to how the company is described by the owner/founder. Work with these prospects to fine-tune their “elevator pitch” so they can present to anyone, anywhere, without boring their audience, when asked what their new company does. Brevity, it seems, is more than just the soul of wit.

In a follow-up post, Segal talks about paying attention to how people describe their roles. Although he doesn’t intentionally draw a link between this post and the previous one, the connections are thought-provoking. In this post, Segal talks about how some of the more successful companies he’s worked with are able to tie their employee’s roles directly to a business result. [2]

Those are powerful tips! The stopwatch test will help you to know how well a founder understands what their marketplace wants and how focused they are; and the second tip will help you to know how efficient, results-focused, and even potentially profitable the startup could be.

So the next time you get a startup founder in your office, give them the stopwatch test and see how long it takes them to describe what their company does. Then ask what they do, along with any other key roles in their startup, and see if they’re able to tie each role to a business result.

Notes:

[1] The Stop Watch Test
[2] Geeks Linked to Business = Success

* For series, references are published in the last installment of the series.

 

  • crimson45

    The stop watch test is new to me and I think this test will really work and you will really know if the start up founder knows what he is talking about. Starting is a business is really tough but with proper guidance and giving them a good path to business in time it will be successful.

  • chrisis

    Totally agreed. I think the test is innovative and unique which is why it is so successful. Any business starting off will need a miracle or proper flow to work.

  • http://www.startwithmoxie.com/ Jim Flowers

    I really like the stop watch gimmick. It's a nice, impersonal way of testing whether the speaker understands the concept of the elevator pitch. A little pre-printed scorecard might be nice, too. Within the one minute time limit does the speaker cover the five common components of the quick intro? 1. Striking fact to gain attention 2. What we do 3. What group we serve 4. Why they care 5. What I want from the listener

  • http://venturehype.com The Hyper Team @ Venture Hype

    To Segal, the three most important areas to cover in the 60-second test are:

    1. What’s the problem
    2. How do you solve it
    3. Where’s the money (business model, how to monetize)

    The “five common components of quick intro” probably works well in other business and social occasions but not in a pitch. For example:

    Striking fact to gain attention – Seasoned investors won't be amused. They've heard way too many “striking facts” when pitched by entrepreneurs.

    What we do, What group we serve, Why they care – Go straight to the problem and tell investors how the startup is going to solve the problem. These three will naturally fall into the pitch if the problem and solution are addressed.

    What I want from the listener – Needless to say, the entrepreneur wants funding if she's pitching an investor. But before she receives any, she needs to tell the investor how the startup makes money.

    We've also written a post related to pitching. You may also like to take a look: 6 Keys to Evaluating a Startup Pitch

  • 1heather

    Ingenious. This really makes the entrepeneur think about what they are doing instead of just strolling through with their hand out. It doesn't make them beg for what they need, but gives them a bit of dignity and pride to do what they have to do.

  • http://venturehype.com The Hyper Team @ Venture Hype

    Good entrepreneurs don't beg for funding. They make convincing pitches and concisely point out why investors should invest in their startups.

  • tongyun

    I really like the stopwatch idea. I'm the type of person who likes it when others get straight to the point. It shows that they are sensitive to my time and respectful of it. People who verbally dance around what they do are just wasting my time and I have very little patience for those type of people.

  • http://venturehype.com The Hyper Team @ Venture Hype

    Unfortunately, many budding entrepreneurs or those who haven't done their research fail to optimize their time with potential investors. More often than not, entrepreneurs only got one shot. Fail to capture investors' interest within scheduled time and they may be rejected even before they get to finish their pitch.

  • http://venturehype.com The Hyper Team @ Venture Hype

    Unfortunately, many budding entrepreneurs or those who haven't done their research fail to optimize their time with potential investors. More often than not, entrepreneurs only got one shot. Fail to capture investors' interest within scheduled time and they may be rejected even before they get to finish their pitch.

  • http://venturehype.com/top-3-finalists-perfect-pitch-richard-branson/ Top 3 Finalists for The Perfect Pitch Competition 2009 with Sir Richard Branson | Venture Hype

    [...] create the “Perfect Pitch,” entrepreneurs were instructed to pitch a one-minute short video or a short written description that would compel investors to take a closer look at [...]

  • http://venturehype.com/be-a-shark-or-an-angel-your-choice/ Be a Shark or an Angel, Your Choice | Venture Hype

    [...] Joey Lo | Nov 05, 2009 Hello there! If you are new here, you might want to subscribe to the RSS feed for updates on this topic. Font Size: + | – In a recent rant by Jason Calacanis, he raged about angel groups that charge entrepreneurs a fee up to US$6,000 for the opportunity to pitch. [...]

Angels and Startups, Don’t Play in China Until You Read This

Angels and Startups, Don’t Play in China Until You Read This

Read Description »

 

Sign Up for Email Updates

Don't miss any articles! Enter your email below to receive them via email. Sign up now.

Venture Hype respects your privacy. We'll never sell or share your email, and you may unsubscribe anytime.

Connect

venrurehype-twitter venrurehype-facebook venrurehype-subscribe email venrurehype-friendfeed venrurehype-rss

What People Are Saying

Quote
Venture Hype provides insightful information about angel investing offered by people who live it every day.
Quote

Bill Warner
Chairman, Triangle Accredited Capital Forum

Special Thanks

Like Our Page

Recent Articles

Sponsored By

Venturehype related post