DON’T Follow the Leader


crowded 150x150 DONT Follow the Leader

Credit: James Cridland

A recent clean-up of my inbox had me erasing invitations to nearly half a dozen social media sites, all promising that I could connect with friends and alumni in a thrilling environment or manage my online identity. (They also all had weird names as if the founders have been naming businesses based on only seven letter tiles they pulled from the Scrabble letter tile bag – but that’s another article for another time.)

The problem with the sites that I deleted without signing up is that they are identical to sites I’m already part of. I’m not interested in yet another LinkedIn clone when I’m already on LinkedIn. Realtors have this problem too — you’ve probably noticed that when you’ve interacted with one to buy or sell your home.

And it’s a real problem in startups, which Martin Zwillings, CEO & Founder of Startup Professionals, has found. In one of his posts, he rants about the maturity of the online dating industry and requests entrepreneurs to NOT pitch him on any more. [1]

From social media to Realtors to dating sites, these aren’t the only industries where sameness is a problem. The problem is, when one business does well as a popular first mover, there are many more that rush in. This was brilliantly parodied in Slate’s video about a service called “Flutter”:

0 DONT Follow the Leader

What’s needed among startups is not a cloned service. And, as Zwillings points out, what’s needed is not a small twist on the same old story. What is needed is a game changer; innovation; brand new thinking.

Of course, you can start by demanding innovation from the entrepreneurs who pitch to you. Like Zwillings, you can politely request not to receive pitches in industry spaces that are mature or declining.

Or, if you’re an innovator yourself – and are as willing to roll up your sleeves and retool the business as you are putting some money into it – you can also see each opportunity as a base from which you can help the entrepreneur innovate.

Start by breaking the common thought pattern that follows first movers: “If they can do it, we can do it just a little better… and monetize it!” Instead, start by looking at the problems that exist in the marketplace and solving those. So an angel who is pitched yet another clone might consider how (or if) that startup can be modified to solve new problems in the market rather than replicate current solutions.

Playing “follow the leader” may have worked for children on the playground, but it has no place in your portfolio because it has no place in the market. Those emails get deleted from my inbox.

Note:

[1] Startups: Your Online Dating Site Will Fail

What’s needed among startups is not a cloned service. And, as Zwillins points out, what’s needed is not a small twist on the same old story. What is needed is a game changer; innovation; brand new thinking.

* For series, references are published in the last installment of the series.

 

  • Twitted by jlojlo

    [...] This post was Twitted by jlojlo [...]

  • http://topsy.com/tb/venturehype.com/dont-follow-the-leader/ Tweets that mention DON’T Follow the Leader | Venture Hype — Topsy.com

    [...] this page was mentioned by Finance4Founders (@fin4founders), propel ICT (@propelict), Joey Lo | @jlojlo (@jlojlo) and others. [...]

  • http://www.biggerpockets.com Joshua Dorkin

    It definitely seems like there is a new social network popping up everyday. Between Ning and every other open source platform, social networks are a dime a dozen. What stand out are the niche communities with real participation . . .

    That said, many people close their networks to visitors, so there is no way to see if there is any action happening. If you can't tell, then the odds of jumping in and getting involved are slim, especially given the sheer number of networks out there.

    We're managing to do very well, I believe, because we have made our network as transparent as possible to all who stop by.

    Thanks for the post!
    Josh
    BiggerPockets.com

  • http://www.evolutionofbpr.com/ Greg (@piplzchoice)

    The driving cause of this phenomena is the investment community, who are always attempting to “find” next Google or whatever is a start up du Jour of the moment. If “lazy” money did not chase “clone” start ups, true innovations would find more expertise and advise. Just my 2c

  • http://venturehype.com The Hyper Team @ Venture Hype

    No matter who it is to blame — the startup community for the lack of innovation or the investment circle for blindly following the herd — we (you, us, and everyone else who care) need to educate people to stop launching or investing in clones.

  • Ricardo

    I agree that there are too many social style sites grabbing at the available business. I guess it reminds me of hearing about the strategy of building a new restaurant beside a popular one that was already up and running – Anticipating the opportunity to get the overflow from the full restaurant.

    But I'm sure that comparison is much too loose to expect to see similar results in today's online social networking environment.

  • nakchura

    It is irritating to discover that you've joined a linked-in clone site all of a sudden. At least here we can get a little advice what to do about it. I just hope even they could read about this and see the mistakes they do and do something about it as well.

  • http://venturehype.com The Hyper Team @ Venture Hype

    Compared to their brick-and-mortar counterparts, online companies have an easier time dealing with scalability issues. Internet businesses can scale up and accommodate many more users much quicker and cheaper than physical entities. Therefore, it wouldn’t be wise to launch a clone and expect an “overflow” from the original community as the original can scale up relatively easily by increasing, e.g. servers. More important, unlike a foodie who’d have burgers every day at similar, but different restaurants, an online user isn’t likely to jump to another cloned online community if she’s already a member of the original site.

  • thaworth

    I have to agree with you 100% on this subject. When something starts making money, others are going to copy it and attempt to start making money themselves. Instead of copying it, they need to figure out how to make it better. Making it better is going to take a lot more work than just copying it, yet people don't want to put in the time or ideas to make something better.

  • http://venturehype.com The Hyper Team @ Venture Hype

    Absolutely. Copying others' ideas can be lucrative — if one can genuinely improve the original concept. Think Microsoft.

  • http://venturehype.com The Hyper Team @ Venture Hype

    Absolutely. Copying others' ideas can be lucrative — if one can genuinely improve the original concept. Think Microsoft.

Angels and Startups, Don’t Play in China Until You Read This

Angels and Startups, Don’t Play in China Until You Read This

Read Description »

 

Sign Up for Email Updates

Don't miss any articles! Enter your email below to receive them via email. Sign up now.

Venture Hype respects your privacy. We'll never sell or share your email, and you may unsubscribe anytime.

Connect

venrurehype-twitter venrurehype-facebook venrurehype-subscribe email venrurehype-friendfeed venrurehype-rss

What People Are Saying

Quote
I was very impressed by the balance shown in a recent pair of postings to Venture Hype by a guest author. Many news writers don’t even try to iron out bias or preference and I saw a really good-faith, conscious effort here that made me a subscriber!
Quote

Paul Connor
Communications Manager,
National Angel Capital Organization (NACO)

Special Thanks

Like Our Page

Recent Articles

Sponsored By

Venturehype related post