Ceding control to an entrepreneur only when pigs fly or when hell freezes over? In that case, drive-by deals aren’t for you.
In a drive-by deal, venture investors fund at the mezzanine / late stage of a company. They’re interested in a quick exit and take little to no role in managing and monitoring the startup.
So if you’re a drive-by investor, you’d fund the entrepreneur and that’s it. No add-on services. No consulting. No mentoring. No contribution at board meetings. You’re simply an investor who briefly makes an appearance before leaving, or one who merely drives by.
Sure, a lot of work has been put into the front end in due diligence and the like, to ensure that the entrepreneur could succeed without you. But after that, you basically say, “Here, take my money, startup. Go be successful. Give me my return, quick.” Then you’d call it a day.
The upside of a drive-by deal is perhaps you’d open yourself up to working with a wider pool of talents. Besides, many able, elite entrepreneurs mightn’t be willing to put up with your “add-on services,” which they might view as simply a grab for power. What happens when two massive egos butt heads? At the very least, a deal won’t get done.
But with a drive-by deal, heads do not get butted (at least not as hard). Egos don’t have to find a way to work together. The entrepreneur does what he does best — turns his brilliant idea into a money-making venture. And you — you just sit back and let him work his magic.
The downside? You don’t get to leverage your expertise and rolodex to maximize the company’s success. Worse yet, you’re so focused on quick returns that you’re prone to push the company towards an IPO even if it ain’t ready.
Are you more of a hands-on angel or a drive-by investor?
* For series, references are published in the last installment of the series.