Chair of TACF Bill Warner: A Snapshot of Angel Investing

Chair of TACF Bill Warner: A Snapshot of Angel Investing

Full Story »

Angels, Is the Entrepreneur Willing to Flip Burgers?

Font Size: + | -

flip burgersSo you’re listening to the pitch. It’s intriguing, without a doubt. The presentation is spot on, the financials add up, the CEO is a ball of fire.

But angels, ask yourself: Is this entrepreneur willing to flip a few burgers? Or at least willing to make some sales calls or write a few product specs? You know … do the dirty work?

Flip a Few Burgers

Sometimes, that’s what it will take. Smart startup founders should be willing to take a hands-on approach, says entrepreneur-turned-investor Mark Suster. That’s right – they should flip burgers.

Suster did it both ways – hands-off and hands-on. In his first tech startup, Suster and his partner landed US$16.5 million in capital before they were even working it full-time; they hired a team of executives and a corral of developers. This was in 2000 – as market valuations fell, the fledgling startup had to cut its staff by more than half in one day. Then, Suster says, he was forced to do the hands-on stuff – make sales calls, make decisions about technical operations. He was flipping the burgers and getting an education in how his company worked.

Grill Marks

The second time around, Suster stayed closer to the flame. This time, his startup raised only US$500,000 – and had a shoestring staff as a result. Suster did more of the down-and-dirty work himself, including marketing, sales, even designing the company logo.

“I did the grunt work. And this is how it should be in startups,” he says.

Just don’t confuse a willingness to take a hands-on approach with the steamrolling Know-It-Alls. The latter, the Armies of One, think they can do it better than anyone else. So they do. And usually, it becomes quite apparent they can’t do everything they think they can. It can be a fine line, but an important distinction.

Lean Times

Often, flipping burgers is a simple matter of survival. Face it: Angels are investing less. A study just released by the Center for Venture Research shows investments were down 27%, to US$9.1 billion, in 2009. The average deal size shrank considerably — by 31% — as well.

That’s not to say angels have shut Heaven’s gate. Angels are investing less, but they’re spreading the wealth thinner and farther afield – they’re spending less on more startups. With less venture capital upfront, the playing field has changed. As a result, the Do-It-Yourself approach is becoming one of the new rules of angel investing.

“Entrepreneurs should find ways to finance their own growth: working without salary, moonlighting, seeking grants, running lean operations, and focusing on an aspect of the business that can generate revenue,” the New York Times wrote last week.

Red Flags

Angels, consider the burger litmus test when as part of the pitch. As the competition heats up, which entrepreneurs are best equipped to withstand the grilling?

As Suster says, if the “CEO can’t drive the demo or the financial model themselves it is a big red flag.”

Sponsored Messages:
Tell a Friend

* Please be civilized. Comments that include ad hominem attacks or destructive criticism will be removed.

  • antoreen
    Methinks Mark Suster’s way of approach is better to face the dry time and obviously it is an assurance to find chances to rejoice when the peacocks stretch their multi-colored wings and begin to dance. Down-to-dirty works, marketing-sales-designing logo of the company, if learned willingly or even under compulsion, are sure to pay dividend during a long-drawn drought period. It is better to flip the burgers and learn workings of a company. Parallel to this one should take care of the fact that one can never be all-in-one as ‘Armies of One’ have been referred.
    I have seen a little theater group, Alkap, to grow in a little known railway suburban of Kharagpur following the same approach and I have seen it when I was a minor.
  • Suster also pointed out in his original post that getting down and doing the dirty work would help entrepreneurs separate the wheat from the chaff when it comes the time to hire help. They'd know whether the candidate would be up for the task since they know exactly what needs to be done and effective ways to get it done.
  • antoreen
    What is a 'dirty work' and what is not so, are questions answers of which should be clear to the individual concerned. 'Getting down and doing dirty work' should be regarded as a process of learning and this learning will sure to pay dividend at appropriate time. The only problem rests in the fact that time to be spared for such 'dirty work' is actually to be lent from the time when you have serious and scheduled assignment.
  • Oftentimes it really isn't up to the entrepreneurs. When cash is tight, they'd have to do things themselves, no matter how tedious those tasks are. No one likes to do dirty work. If they're willing to do it then it at least shows their determination and commitment.
blog comments powered by Disqus
  • Categories
  • New to angel investing? Send us your question and begin investing in startups today.
    ask venturehype
     
  • "You can be anything you want to be, if only you believe with sufficient conviction and act in accordance with your faith; for whatever the mind can conceive and believe, the mind can achieve."

    -Napoleon Hill

 e-Newsletter Signup

Delivered straight to your inbox every week, VH News offers quick tips, links and info relevant to angel and seed investors. Stay abreast of what's making news in the angel investing space. Sign up now.



Venture Hype respects your privacy. We'll never sell or share your email, and you may unsubscribe anytime.

Join the 9930 tweeps who follow us on Twitter, and the 2443 daily readers (as of March 9, Google FeedBurner) who subscribe to our feed.
View in: Mobile | Standard